Paul Taylor: The Ethics of Respect for Nature.
The aim of this paper is to show why the individualistic biocentrism of Paul Taylor is failing in its logical argumentations. This life-centered system of environmental ethics is based on the idea that all living beings are teleological center of.
Paul Taylor’s concept of biocentric ethics as presented in his book Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics was developed by him as a rejection of anthropocentrism (which exalts human beings at the detriment of other living beings) and extensionism for being so narrow in its inclusion of only sentient beings in the sphere of moral relevance.
The Ethics of Respect for Nature Essay Sample. Paul Taylor envisioned the possibility of a life centered system through the workings of two concepts. The first concept being the good, or well-being, of a living thing. This concept entails doing what is necessary for the welfare of nature.
When Paul Taylor’s Respect for Nature was published in 1986, it was an intellectually liberating event. Environmental ethics was a young field very much in search of its identity. While animals were on the academic agenda thanks to Peter Singer and Tom Regan, it was far from clear how to think sensibly about our moral relations with nonsentient nature.
Paul Taylor: The Ethics of Respect for Nature. Which of the following types of things would Taylor claim has a good of its own? a. Organisms. b. Species populations. c. Communities of life. d. All of the above. Which of the following does Taylor claim is a major source of the belief in human superiority? a.
Editions for Respect for Nature: A Theory of Environmental Ethics: 069102250X (Paperback published in 1986), 0691150249 (Paperback published in 2011), (K.
Respect for Nature defends a biocentric theory of environmental ethics. Without making claims for the moral rights of plants and animals, Paul Taylor offers a reasoned alternative to the prevailing anthropocentric view, according to which the natural environment and its wild biotic communities are valued only as objects for human use or enjoyment.